Why the ROI of ERP Implementation Falls Short—And the Data-Driven Fixes That Work

More than half of the IT executives in our 2025 State of Cloud & ERP Operations report admit their biggest worry during rollout is landing over budget and over time (53%). Reality bears that out: only 29% of projects actually finish on time and on budget, while 27 % limp across the line both late and over budget. When costs balloon and timelines slip, the promised return on investment (ROI) of ERP implementation erodes long before the system goes live.

The uncomfortable truth is that ERP operations are stuck in the past, where processes and methodologies remain manual, fragmented, and reactive. IT leaders face the impossible task of reducing costs while accelerating change, yet continue relying on outdated technology that cannot deliver both outcomes simultaneously.

Two silent ROI killers hiding in plain sight

• Manual testing & broken UAT. A mere 24% of organizations have any test automation in place; in contrast, 52% still test manually in-house. No surprise that user-acceptance testing tops the list of testing headaches for 59 % of leaders, far ahead of patch and integration issues. Every manual cycle drags projects out and spikes re-work, draining the ROI of ERP implementation long after cut-over.

• Runaway support costs. Only 10% of companies keep support spend below 5% of the IT budget; 37% spend 10–20%, and another 11% exceed 30%. Worse, a majority (54%) say their self-service portal resolves under a quarter of tickets, so costly break-fix work piles up

Our 2025 State of Cloud & ERP Operations Report reveals a struggling system where testing, support, adoption, and change management are all breaking under pressure. The fragmented approach to ERP lifecycle management isn't only inefficient, but also unsustainable, as enterprises face mounting pressure to optimize their operations.

How to ensure strategic ROI integriy

A practical way to safeguard the ROI of ERP implementation is to treat testing, especially user acceptance testing, as a value driver rather than a checkbox. Our latest research found that organizations automating UAT with no-code, AI-powered tools trimmed regression cycles by nearly 70% and cut post-go-live ticket volumes by 40%.  

Those savings compound. Fewer fire drills mean lower contractor costs, faster patch adoption, and an IT team freed to focus on innovation. Best practice #1, then, is to embed automated UAT early, well before conference-room pilots, so you start realizing returns long before cut-over.

Second, anchor every phase of the project to financial KPIs that matter to the business. Leading orgs map cycle-time reduction, inventory turns, and support-ticket deflection to hard dollar values, then publish a “value scorecard” quarterly.  

When the CFO sees that each one-day drop in order-to-cash injects $150k in working capital, funding for optimization suddenly becomes an easy conversation. This KPI discipline not only proves the ROI of ERP implementation; it also creates a virtuous loop in which incremental gains fund the next wave of automation, analytics, and AI initiatives.

Finally, remember that sustained ROI lives or dies on effective post-go-live governance. Standing up a cross-functional “ERP value office” keeps ownership clear and maintains high momentum.  

The team reviews release cadence, monitors KPI drift, and prioritizes enhancements that extend the ROI of ERP implementation, from self-service analytics to process automation. Coupled with a robust change management plan that includes role-based training and sandboxes, this structure turns an ERP platform from a static IT asset into a continuously compounding competitive advantage.

Three Survey-Backed Accelerators for Fast Payback

1. Automate early—especially UAT. Companies that replace spreadsheets with no-code, AI-driven test automation slash UAT cycles by up to 70 % in our benchmarks, turning the slowest project phase into a speed bump instead of a roadblock.

2. Transform support from a cost center to a self-service engine. Pair knowledge-base chatbots with AI impact analysis that identifies which objects a patch will touch before it lands. This combination alone can reduce ticket volume by 30–40%, freeing the budget for innovation rather than firefighting.

3. Create a cross-functional “ERP Value Office.” Tie change requests to hard KPIs—cycle-time, cash-flow lift, ticket deflection—and review them quarterly. In our survey, teams that track financial KPIs are 6–12 months faster to positive cash flow than their peers

Turning Survey Insights into Competitive Edge

More than half of IT leaders (57%) have been tasked with reducing OPEX and FTE this year. The only sustainable path is a modern testing and change-management foundation:

• Pre-built regression libraries slash build time and raise coverage on day one.

• AI impact analysis keeps tests current with every quarterly release.

• Role-based portals enable business users to validate changes without adding to the IT workload.

When those elements come together, the ROI of ERP implementation flips from a lagging indicator to a leading driver of strategic capacity, funding the next wave of AI initiatives that 63% of executives rank as a top two-year priority.

Why Opkey closes the ROI gap

Survey respondents rank “leveraging AI enhancements” (63%) and “reducing operating & support costs” (54 %) as their top 24-month priorities. Opkey delivers both: 30,000+ pre-built ERP test cases, self-healing scripts that update in minutes, and a role-based portal that empowers business users to validate changes without piling work on IT. The result? Faster releases, lower OPEX, and an ROI of ERP implementation that compounds instead of collapses.

Ready to see the numbers for your environment? Download the full report or book a 30-minute ROI assessment to map your fastest path from ERP cost center to growth engine

‍